FACTOR FICTION, POPPY & HIS SICK PUPPIES: THE PARTY OF NO EQUALS NO PARTY! DON'T CALL ME KAY! OR RACHEL, OR SHELLEY, OR SUE, OR KELLEY, OR TIFFANY, OR MARCIE--BURYING ME UNDER A DOG PILE OF SHIT, ALL USING DERIVATIVES OF THE NAME JOANN, JO, JOAN, JOANNE, JOANE, JOHANNE, JOHANN, ETC.; SOME CLOWNS HAVE GOTTEN A HOLD OF MY NAME AND ARE SENDING OUT CRAZY LETTERS, EMAILS, OR BLOGS, CENSORED UNDER MY NAME . . . THE BUSHITTES, CIA, FBI, NSA, MORMONS, REPUBLICANS, STATE OF UTAH, IRON & WASHINGTON COUNTIES, ARE TAKING LIBERTIES WITH MY NAME, INTERNATIONALLY KNOWN, BUT NOT ALWAYS IN A GOOD WAY, WITH INFERIOR REPRESENTATION BY FAKES JOANNS, CAPITALIZING ON MY PASSION & LOVE FOR THE LAW, HISTORY OF PRESERVING, DEFENDING & PROTECTING THE U.S. & STATE CONSTITUTIONS, DATING BACK TO 1991, OR WHEN I WAS IN LAW SCHOOL, BRINGING OUT A TORRENT OF RAGE IN ME, BEYOND DESCRIBING, WTF! THE NSA POWERS, LIMITED TO ENEMY COMBATANTS, IN THE WAR AGAINST AL QAEDA, HAVE BEEN WAGED IN A WAR OF TERROR AGAINST A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ATTORNEY! ALL DONE ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY, UNCONSTITUTIONALLY, AND IN VIOLATION OF MY 1ST, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH, 8TH, 9TH, 10TH, & 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, NOT TO MENTION ALL RIGHTS, INCORPORATED THROUGH THE 9TH & 10TH AMENDMENTS, BRINGING IN NON-ENUMERATED RIGHTS, LIKE THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, RIGHTS RETAINED BY ME, LIKE SOLE ACCESS, PROPRIETY, CONTROL, PROFIT, DISTRIBUTION, COLLECTION OF MONETARY REWARDS, CREDIT AND ABSOLUTE POWER OVER MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, NAME, CHILDREN, GRANDCHILDREN, CASES, BLOG(S), WRITINGS, LICENSES, LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, LEGISLATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS, WHETHER IN WRITING OR THROUGH ORAL PRESENTATION, OR ACCOMPLISHMENTS WHILE TEACHING AT THREE UNIVERSITIES, GRANTS, MANUALS, INCLUDING ALL HONORS, AWARDS, RECOGNITION, LETTERS OF PRAISE, SCHOLARSHIPS, MEMBERSHIPS IN SCHOLASTIC OR HONOR SOCIETIES, WRITINGS AND PUBLICATIONS, GRADES, TRANSCRIPTS, RESUMES, JOBS, EXPERIENCE, EDUCATION, HISTORY, LIFE STORIES, MARRIAGES, DATING HISTORY, CLIENTS, JAIL & PRISON VISITS, COURTROOM APPEARANCES, OWNERSHIP OR RIGHTS OF OWNERSHIP TO HOMES, PROPERTY, FURNITURE, ART, PERSONAL FAMILY PICTURES, CERTIFICATES, LEGAL DEGREES, COLLEGE DEGREES, BAR ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIPS, LAW PRACTICES, EMAILS, PHONE CALLS, WEB & INTERNET ACTIVITIES, ALL STOLEN FROM ME, THROUGH PATTERNS OF CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES, ADAPTIONS AND ABERRANT INTERPRETATIONS, OF FISA, NSA, PRISM PROGRAMS, THE PATRIOT ACT, AND ALL ACTIONS INVOLVING WIRETAPPING, EAVESDROPPING, COMMUNICATION INTERCEPTION, SCANNING, FAKE IP ADDRESSES, BURYING IN THE DEEP WEB OR DARK INTERNET, SECRET ACCOUNTS, WARRANTLESS SEARCHES & SEIZURES, LACKING PROBABLY CAUSE OR JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT, INVASION OF PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION, PRIVATE COMMUNICATIONS, TEXTS, FAX AND OTHER FORMS OF ELECTRONIC TRANSFERS OF COMMUNICATIONS, CONVERTING, CONVEYING, ASSIGNING, ALLEGING, AND ASSERTING REPRESENTATION WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION, INDICATING THROUGH DECEPTION, THAT I AM ANYONE, OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL, ORIGINAL, LEGAL, AUTHORIZED, ATTORNEY, MOTHER, GRANDMOTHER, JOANN S. SECRIST, WHO HAS BEEN SITTING HERE, AT MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT, FROM 7:00 A.M., TO AT LEAST NOW, AT 5:38 P.M., MOUNTAIN STANDARD TIME, HERE ON IDAHO STREET, IN KALISPELL, MONTANA--BASICALLY, HOMELESS, DUE TO FEAR OF SURVEILLANCE, STAKING OUT, LYING IN WAIT, TRAPPING, WITH THE INTENT TO FALSELY IMPRISON, INCARCERATE, DETAIN, HOLD, WITHOUT CHARGES, INFORMATION, WARRANT, FOR AN UNDISCLOSED AMOUNT OF TIME, IF NOT INDEFINITELY--ALLEGEDLY, WHILE ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW! THERE IS NO CIVIL OR CRIMINAL IMMUNITY FOR NSA, FBI, CIA, LAW ENFORCMEMNT ACTIVITIES, UNDER FISA, THE PATRIOT ACT, PRISM PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS OR AMENDED VERSIONS OF ANY OF THESE ACTS, ALLEGEDLY USED IN THE WAR ON TERROR--CONSIDERING AN AMERICAN PERSON/CITIZEN AN ENEMY COMBATANT, A CLASSIFICATION RESERVED FOR FOREIGN COUNTRIES, OR THEIR AGENTS, IN A DECLARED WAR, WITH LITTLE COMPENSATION, TO NONE, RENUMERATION TO REMOVE THE YEARS OF ABUSE OF POWER, STATEWIDE & NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE, TRACKING, TRACING, INTERSTATE BATTERY & ASSAULT, INTIMIDATION, THREATS, ATTEMPTS AT ELICITING FEAR, OR ATTEMPTS TO CAPTURE, THAT WILL RECTIFY ROUGHLY 24 YEARS OF SEXUAL, PREDATORY, AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, RICO OR ORGANIZED CRIME, PERPETRATED BY THE NSA, FBI, CIA MEMBERS OF THE MORMON CHURCH, THE SOUTHWICK & CHRISTENSEN EXTENDED FAMILIES AND CONNECTED GOVERNMENT ENTITIES, UNDER THE GUISE OF LEGALITY, CIVILITY, GOOD FAITH INTENTIONS OR JUSTIFICATIONS . . . ALL DONE FOR PERSONAL, PROFESSIONAL, POLITICAL AND MONETARY GAIN, RECOGNITION, AND AMBITION! THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, USING LOCAL, STATE GOVERNMENTS, NGOs, PLUS PRIVATE COMPANIES, PEOPLE, ENTITIES, ACTING AS ARMS OF THE GOVERNMENT, BRIBING, THREATENING, ENTICING, ENCOURAGING, AND KILLING, AIDING & ABETTING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANTS, RATS, CONSPIRATORIAL COLLUSION, COLLABORATION, POLITICAL PARTIES, THROUGH USE OF GIFTS, ENTICEMENT, MEMBERSHIPS, GRANTS . . . YOU DO THE MATH, ALL LISTED, PLUS, 8 YEARS OF MY LIFE, EXTRACTION OF A FEMALE BODY PART, DEATH SENTENCE, THEFT OF SON'S BANDS--PARALLAX, GOD'S REVOLVER, MARALOKA, MUSIC, LYRICS, & PERSONNAS, DELETING MY NAME OFF, OR LETTING DUPLICATES, MULTIPLES, FORGE OR STEAL EVERYTHING FOR THE LAST 14 YEARS, WITH COVER-UP BACK TO LAW SCHOOL AT BYU, PLUS, $700 MILLION IN CASES, MORE LINED UP AND WAITING, INTERFERENCE WITH A 10TH CIRCUIT COURT & U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE, APPEARANCE, SETTLEMENTS, COST OF MY LAW PRACTICE, NAME, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, UP TO $25,000, PER HIT/RESULT, UP TO 155 MILLION IN ONE DAY IN FINES, FOR DIGITAL MILLENNIUM ACT VIOLATIONS, INTERFERING WITH BLOG(S), MONEY FOR ADVERTISING, FOR DUPLICATE BLOG--USING SAME NAME, WITH LIGHTENED "ASS" INDICATING SAME, BUT DIFFERENT BLOG--YET SAME NAME, BIO, ARTICLES, AS FAR AS I KNOW, STOLEN BLOGS--INTERNET SHERIFF, AND MONEY ON SECOND SITE, FROM HITS & RESULTS, ALIENATION OF AFFECTION, FAMILY INTERFERENCE & INFILTRATION, FRAMING ME FOR A CRIME, TRAVEL EXPENSES AS A RESULT, ANOTHER THREE YEARS OF MY LIFE ON THE RUN, SINCE INDUCTION & SWEARING IN AT U.S. SUPREME COURT, THEFT OF ALL VEHICLES, PLUS ANY POSSABILTY OF PURCHASE, LIBERTY RESTRICTIONS, INTERFERENCE WITH POLITICAL, EMPLOYMENT, CASE ACTIVITY, SLANDER & LIBEL, ETC. . . .OWE ME AND MY FAMILY, $1 BILLION, IN GENERAL, COMPENSATORY, SPECIAL & PUNITIVE DAMAGES! FU! YOU DO THE NUMBERS!

• Cole, Epstein, Heynmann and eleven other prominent legal scholars (Beth Nolan, Curtis Bradley, Geoffrey Stone, Harold Hongju Koh, Kathleen Sullivan, Laurence Tribe, Martin Lederman, Ronald Dworkin, Walter Dellinger, William S. Sessions and William Van Alstyne) wrote a letter to Congress that appeared in the New York Review of Books on February 9, 2006.^[126] They wrote that "the Justice Department's defense of what it concedes was secret and warrantless electronic surveillance of persons within the United States fails to identify any plausible legal authority for such surveillance. Accordingly the program appears on its face to violate existing law." They summarized:

  In conclusion, the DOJ letter fails to offer a plausible legal defense of the NSA domestic spying program. If the administration felt that FISA was insufficient, the proper course was to seek legislative amendment, as it did with other aspects of FISA in the Patriot Act, and as Congress expressly contemplated when it enacted the wartime wiretap provision in FISA. One of the crucial features of a constitutional democracy is that it is always open to the President—or anyone else—to seek to change the law. But it is also beyond dispute that, in such a democracy, the President cannot simply violate criminal laws behind closed doors because he deems them obsolete or impracticable.

All Jordan Paust, Mike and Teresa Baker College Professor of Law at the University of Houston Law Center, rejected the administration's legal arguments for the NSA program writing:^[137]

• George W. Bush and US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales claim that domestic spying in manifest violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was authorized by Congress in broad language in the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) regarding persons responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Similar claims have been made in a December 22 letter from Assistant Attorney General William Moschella to the leaders of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. The claims are patently false... ... Moreover, any so-called inherent presidential authority to spy on Americans at home (perhaps of the kind denounced in Youngstown (1952) and which no strict constructionist should pretend to recognize), has been clearly limited in the FISA in 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(f) and 50 U.S.C. § 1809(a)(1), as supplemented by the criminal provisions in 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1).

• Professor Peter Swire, the C. William O’Neill Professor of Law at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and Visiting Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, wrote a detailed "Legal FAQs on NSA Wiretaps" concluding that "[b]ased on the facts available to date, the wiretap program appears to be clearly illegal."^[127] Prof. Swire has previously written a very detailed history and analysis of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, published in Volume 72 of the George Washington Law Review, at 1306 (2004) and previously chaired a White House Working Group, including the intelligence agencies, on how to update electronic surveillance law for the Internet Age.
• Robert Reinstein, dean of the law school at Temple University, has asserted that the warrantless domestic spying program is

  a pretty straightforward case where the president is acting illegally... When Congress speaks on questions that are domestic in nature, I really can't think of a situation where the president has successfully asserted a constitutional power to supersede that... This is domestic surveillance over American citizens for whom there is no evidence or proof that they are involved in any illegal activity, and it is in contravention of a statute of Congress specifically designed to prevent this.

• • Mr. Reinstein asserted that the broad consensus among legal scholars and national security experts is similar to his own analysis, and he predicted that the courts will rule that the program is unconstitutional.^[128]