Monday, September 7, 2015

WHILE COPS ARE STROKING PUSSY CATS (CIA), THERE IS A RATTLER COILED IN THE CORNER, FANGS BARE, TONGUE LASHING, READY TO GO FOR THE JUGGLER! CAREFUL, WHO YOU THINK IT ME! LOL! LESS YAWNS, MORE SMILES! CELL PHONE SAGA--MY PHONE IS LOCKED! LIKE IN GOVERNMENT LOCKED! SCREAM! "THEY" TOOK MY OLD PHONE, I LEFT IN GRAND JUNCTION TO FOOL THE COPS, AT WALMART, OPEN 24/7, MAKE THE COPS THINK THAT I WAS SHOPPING ALL NIGHT, WHILE I WAS ON MY WAY BACK TO MONTANA. I WAITED A MONTH, PURCHASED A NEW PHONE, HAD THEM TRANSFER MY OLD NUMBER ONTO THIS NEW PHONE--WHEN THE MONTH WAS OVER, AND IT WAS TIME TO ACTIVATE THE NEW MONTH, THESE LYING FUCKERS, TOOK MY NEW PHONE WITH MY OLD NUMBER, THAT I HAVE HAD FOR A YEAR, AND TRANSFERRED IT BACK TO MY OLD PHONE WITH THE COPS, AND LOCKED MY NEW PHONE UP, MAKING IT LOOK LIKE MY SERVICE STOPPED ON MY NEW PHONE, SAME NUMBER AND THEN LOCKED UP ALL SERVICE DATES, AS IF THIS PHONE STOPPED SERVICE 8/20/15, EVEN THOUGH I HAD MINUTES ON THE PHONE, LOCKED UPO THE NUMBER, STEALING IT BACK TO MY PHONE WITH THE COPS, MAKING IT LOOK LIKE THE ONE THEY HAD WAS NEVER REPLACED BY THE ONE I HAVE, AND THEN STOPPED ALL EVIDENCE THAT THE PHONE I HAVE IS STILL IN BUSINESS, SO THE FAKE FUCKING BITCHES< WITH MY OLD PHONE, CAN CLAIM THE LETTER I WROTE, AS MYSELF, ATTORNEY, JOANN S. SECRIST, AT ABOUT THE SAME TIME OF REACTIVATING MY PHONE SERVICE, SO IT LOOKED LIKE THE NUMBER AT THE TOP OF THE LEGAL LETTER, HAD BEEN WRITTEN BY THE HOLDER OF MY OLD PHONE, RATHER THAN MY MYSELF, THE ATTORNEY, WRITER OF THE LETTER, ETC.! SNEAKY, SNEAKY, SNEAKY . . . BUT THEY HAVE TO GET UP WAY EARLY TO BEAT ME! LOL! "THEY" ALL SLEEP IN . . . BEAT THEM EVERY TIME! BAND ON THE RUN . . . DOING THE SAME SHIT TO MY SON'S BAND, "THE DITCH AND THE DELTA" . . . WEB GAMES, SMOKE SCREENS, TRICKS, DOUBLES, THEFT! AND GOVERNMENT SANCTIONED! IS THIS THE TYPE OF GOVERNMENT YOU WANT? SERIOUSLY, ASSET FORFEITURE ON STEROIDS!!!!!!!!! FORFEITING ENTIRE HUMAN BEINGS AND ALL INTELLECTUAL ASSETS! CASES, LEGISLATION, BLOGS, BANDS, MONEY, MONEY, MONEY . . . AND THEN, THEY WANT ME AND MY SON, TO CREATE NEW STREAMS OF INCOME FOR THEM TO STEAL! FUCK YOU BASTARDS!!!!!! WHICH LEADS ME TO THE SUBJECT I WANT TO TALK ABOUT TODAY, IN "MY" BLOG, WHICH ONLY PROVES, I AM NOT THE COPS' BITCH! I WANT TO EXPLAIN, THE RECENT RULING OUT OF THE MONTANA SUPREME COURT, DEALING WITH COPS PRETENDING TO BE JUDGES, ORDERING A DEFENDANT TO SELL HIS FIREARMS, THAT WERE SEIZED IN, OBVIOUSLY, A SEARCH, PROBABLY WARRANTLESS, OF HIS HOME OR VEHICLE, PRODUCING THE GUNS . . . AND THEN, TRYING TO MAKE THE DEFENDANT SELL HIS GUNS, IN THE COPS POSSESSION, TO COVER JAIL COSTS, THAT WERE NEVER ORDERED BY THE JUDGE! SCEAMMMMMM! STICK TO COP WORK, YOU ARE SHITTY ATTORNEYS, DON''T KNOW THE CONSTITUTION, NOR THE LAW, AND ARE OVERSTEPPING YOUR JURISDICTION OF POWER!!!!!!! YOU ARE NEGLECTING TO PROVIDE THE DEFENDANT WITH DUE PROCESS, TAKING PROPERTY, IN VIOLATION OF HIS 5TH AND 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS--CAN'T TAKE LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW!!!!!!! AND THE NEW RULING TELLS YOU THAT . . . YOU ARE TO GOT THROUGH FORMAL FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS TO TAKE THE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF THE DEFENDANT . . . NEWSFLASH . . . HE HAS NOT BEEN "CONVICTED" OF A CRIME, CHARGED MAYBE, CONVICTED, NO! SO, IT IS THE COPS, WHO ARE THE THIEVES AND BREAKING THE LAWS AND VIOLATING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW, AH, SECTION 1983 CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIONS, MY FORTE'! BRING IT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE CONSTITUTIONAL RATIONALE BEHIND THE RULING, WHICH IS DEAD SPOT ON!!!!!! LEARN, YOU PATRIOT ACT FUCKS! CONTRARY TO COMMON THOUGHT AND TRADITIONS FOR THE LAST FUCKIN' 15 YEARS, VIOLATING 240 YEARS OF WELL ESTABLISHED LAWS, "WE THE PEOPLE" HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AND RIGHTS, YOU BETTER START RESPECTING, AGAIN! THIS IS OLD SCHOOL, SHIT, YOU SHOULD KNOW! LIABILITY, LIABILITY, LIABILITY!!!!!!!! SAVE YOUR DEPARTMENT SOME MONEY, FOLLOW THE LAW!!!!!!!!!

50 Shades of Cops in Less Than 1 Hour!

So, my friend, again, Annie, owner of the Granite Peak Grill, with an "A+" food rating, came a picked me up, last Saturday night, and we, didn't necessarily kiss and make up, but mended past wrongs, or basically didn't mention them, and picked up where we left off.  After eating dinner, at the Central Christian Church, behind the library, with the great, Feeding the Flathead Community Services, serving up a fresh and delicious meal, that even a restaurateur, and great cook like Annie, enjoyed, she took me over to Sam Farmer's apartment at the Glacier Manor, where I was going to pay $10 per night to couch surf, until I either left town, or decided where I want to live, or stay.  But, as Annie and I sat in front of the apartment complex, for an hour or so, at least, 50 cops and sheriff's vehicles, crossed the streets, going both ways, to harass and try, and I emphasize that word, "try" to intimidate us.  Which, obviously didn't work, because we just counted the fools driving back and forth, watching with curiosity and wondering, what the hell they were doing?  While the sheriffs are housed right down the street, this was an abnormal number of cops, going up and down the streets, seeing there were no crimes, no fires, no apparent activities that would warrant this type and show of fire power, other than to harass the people sitting in the car out front, containing a hated enemy of the cops, for over 20 years!  LOL!

We just kind of ignored them, and spent our time talking legal shit, working out some issues that Annie had, and what to do about them.  Finally, we got to personal stuff, that was much more fun to talk about, and I decided, free couch and wonderful food, beat Sam's offer for the night's lodging.  I will work for food and Diet Coke!  Cheap legal and to me a fair deal, because, if I didn't have this bartering tool of the trade, I would actually have to settle down and live somewhere!  LOL!  Don't know if I am ready for that yet, it is still not cold enough, and I want to see the fall leaves and colors in the Flathead Valley and Glacier National Park, before departing for cheaper accommodations, like back at the Poverello, or even possibly getting my own place.  I am just a Gypsy at heart, don't really dig waking up to either the same man or the same four walls, yet in my life!  LOL!  So, as fate would have it, I have a viable trade that people always welcome a relatively free attorney!  People hate attorneys, until they need one, then they are the most welcome friend!  I love the law, love the power of it, love the ability to help, have low overhead, my make shift office in Playplace Land at McDonald's, so I can afford to help people and always have!  Generally for free . . . I see my license as a license to serve!

Tap Into a New Dimension of Fun!

Annie, is about 15 years younger than me, she was a convert to the Mormon church, so she is not a brainwashed and prudish as I am, but I am having a hard time convincing her that, me and her could have a whole hell of a lot of fun, with her new cook and his friend, an Iraq vet, whom I met yesterday . . . young, but not too young, cute, just recently divorced, hot to trot, and not afraid to make his services available, and kind of on the same page as I am, with government shit, but he is more of a vigilante type, wanting to protect the innocent, the little guy from government invasion, infiltration and interference in their lives . . . I do it with the law, he wants to do it with a gun!  I told him, blowing away cops, taking the law into his own hands, would make him just as big a violator of their rights, as they are of the people's rights.  He tended to agree with me, when I laid it all out for him . . . he gets it, better than the cops, it makes sense to him.  Later in this blog, I will try to make sense to the cops, so they get it, and stop thinking I am just picking on them and forcing them to do something that is other than the law, the Supreme Law of the Land, the U.S. Constitution!

So, this guy is hot, but a man can turn a woman off in about zero seconds flat with a burp, or a fart, or picking his nose!  He told me that one of the issues his wife had, was that he had an issue with picking his nose in front of her . . . I have an issue with that too.  Women are not a man's buddy, and the women who spend the most time with him, are likely sexual partners of one flavor or another, and don't dig being treated the same as their buddies would.  I informed him that familiarity breeds contempt, and that my marriage to my first husband was over, before it started, when he farted, with my head in his lap, while we were on our way out of town to our honeymoon.  When I confronted him on it, he said, that while on his Mormon mission, the way the guys tested their companions, was to fart in front of them and if they laughed, they were cool and could roll with things, but if they didn't, they were probably going to have problems with them!  

Newsflash . . . a wife, lover, girlfriend, or even a one night stand, is not going to dig, burping, farting, or doing crude behavior, around them, thinking that sex will come natural after that!  Call me a prude, but, seriously, there is a difference between watching a game with the guys and watching it with women present!  Or there should be . . . you are not sticking a body part in your buddy, but you are with us . . . we want to be treated differently!  In my family, you were sequestered to the dungeon in the basement, if you farted in front of anyone else in the family, we were totally disgusted!  Some of us were raised differently than others, there is a difference between a Utah chick and a Montana chick, but all women need some respect and to be treated with dignity if you think for one second, you are sticking your dick in us!  And this young dude made no qualms that he would be willing to do about whatever.  I considered taking him up on it, but jI am driven by brains, not pussy, therefore, I will wait and see . . . twice belching in front of me, unabashedly, turned me off, but time . . . that is just how easy it is to lose with a woman, guys.

But it is a new day, the boyz are board and want to have a bonfire tonight, and I am easy to forgive people, even men, there wrongs!  LOL!  I believe in repentance, new chances and starts!  And, I am always up to a new experience and adventure, with the possibilities of having good clean fun!  I am of age.  Last night we all watched the movie, Wild, with Reese Whitherspoon, and many of the conclusions, she came to, that all the stuff she went through, good or bad, was what got her to where she is today, and she was grateful, as am I.

Understanding Firearm Laws, Forfeiture Laws, and Rights

Okay, in most states, the state legislatures, at the behest of the cops, mainly and prosecutors, they have enacted minimum mandatory laws, or gun enhancements, that anyone caught committing a crime, can have their weapons confiscated, and they can be sited with 10 year enhancements to any charges, for possessing firearms . . . which is probably, unconstitutional on its face, given the 2nd amendment; however, state legislatures, not Congress, are given the ability to regulate the use of guns and firearms, so . . . they may be able to infringe on the rights of gun owners.  But, with the presumption of innocence, until proven guilty, it is wrong for cops to confiscate the property of the accused, prior to being charged, and convicted with a crime, and if they do, they have run afoul of violating hard core constitutional rights, that have long been on the books, before the states, cops, government, ever thought of limiting those rights, or seizing guns!  
The difficult thing with constitutional law, is that there are layers of analysis, taking many sections of the Constitution into consideration, like private property rights, due process, and not being able to take property or liberties, without due process of law, or equal protection.  Under the 14th amendment, there are statements about the fact that no state, can deny a citizen privileges, that are provided to other citizens.  So, the starting point for any attorney, is to look at the general protections and provisions in the U.S. Constitution, having a basic understanding of rights, protections and liberties, in addition to looking at individual state provisions that may even give greater rights, than those in the U.S. Constitution, with that document, serving as the bottom line, that no state can go below, in taking away or denying rights, protections and liberties.  And, once again, looking at case law, U.S. Supreme Court rulings that interpret the laws, keeping in mind the basic tenants of constitutional law: (1) Marbury vs. Madison, any law that is repugnant to the Constitution, is VOID; and (2) McCulloch vs. Maryland, any law that is consistent with the Constitution, is constitutional!  That should be the touchstone for all laws passed!

Sophistication in the Law

So, for a in depth analysis, that is the starting point, then comes, regulatory laws, codes, statutes, acts, etc. These are secondary, and inferior to the Constitutions, both federally and state wise.  A black and white approach to any constitutional law issue, takes time, experience, thought, layers of analysis, looking at the hierarchy of laws, all laws are not created equal, nor is case law, for the most part, equal to constitutional provisions, it is just to interpret the plain language of the Constitution, within the parameters, of intent and history, regarding that particular section of the United States Constitution or state constitutional provision. That is why, the judicial branch, dealing with the courts, gets the best and the brightest, to sit on the bench, especially for justices on the United States Supreme Court. This is tough law to say the least, and even the justices are going to see the issues differently, as stated in the dissenting opinion.  The law is about, definitions and hair splitting; therefore, an easy knee jerk reaction, black and white thinking will  never do an issue justice, nor get you the right decision or result.

I am tired of people dissing the President, the Court, when they don't get the law in the first place, nor do they understand the intricacies of the law, nor the analytical processes that need to be gone through to get the right decision on an issue, and it is, entirely complicated!  Black and white thinkers, not invited!  So, when either I, seeing myself as a mini-supreme court, doing my own analysis, or the United States Supreme Court, I start at ground zero, and if have not preconceived notions or ideas of how the ruling or outcome on this issues should end up . . . it is more like a maze, with multi-faceted levels of analysis all bump up against each other, and there are some laws, provisions that will trump others, in this authoritative and hierarchical set of laws that interface, both federal and state, laws, that make up our federalist system of government. No, snap decisions are warranted, nor wanted!  

We need to let courts, judges, those trained in the law, not cops, make the decisions, confiscations, forfeitures, within the parameters of the rights, protections and liberties, and that is not something any cop is justified in making a ruling, decision, or call on . . . that is why the judge said, that any property that is considered forfeited, needs to go through formal proceedings, giving the person, the full advantage of DUE PROCESS or the process that is due for this particular issue!  So, in other words, there is a reason a person needs to go to four years of college, and three years of law school, pass the bar exam, before becoming an attorney, and to be a judge, long years of practice, respected by their peers, with a temperament worthy of a judge, and tons of patience, with a shit load of legal assistants, law clerks, and others to help with decision making, to get it right!

Distinguishing Between Non-Violent and Violent Crimes

If, under the strict scrutiny of the eyes of a judge, before houses should be search, or weapons seized, there should be a distinction between violent and non-violent crimes . . . was the crime committed, connected in anyway to firearms?  If not, then the guns should be left in the house, and possibly no search of the premise is warranted, or only upon, getting a 4th amendment warrant, which is the general law, looking for a specific person, item, that is listed with particularity or specificity, in a warrant, to be executed, after the judge finds sufficient probable cause!  And that is under the oath and attestation of the cops, making the claim of reason for the warrant, with the possibility that either a crime has been committed, or there is sufficient evidence to overcome the restrictions and protections set by the Constitution that it is more probable than not, that that person committed the crime!  Remember: the 4th amendment is to protect people from UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES!

If there is a situation of domestic violence, and there is a threat of use of a gun, then, it may be expedient to remove the gun from the home; however, if there is just a call because some one's music is too loud, and there is a disturbance of the peace of a neighbor, then searching a house, or taking guns, is not warranted, nor necessary.  There needs to be a distinction between civil issues and criminal issues.  When you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail, but it should not be.  If there is something involving a divorce, or child custody, there may or may not be criminal issues involved, like a dispute over time, place, and conditions of switching kids, that just needs a level headed cop, to come in and serve as a peace officer, to restore sanity and calm to a volatile situation, rather than to arrest someone, that doesn't need to be arrested, just reassured, either of their rights or the fact that they are violating a parenting plan or something like that, which is not criminal, but a pain in the ass, and could lead to criminal acts, if not stopped.

I would say, that in many cases, peace officers are called for, but if there are hard core criminals involved, put on your, law enforcement hats!  Once a friend of mine, a single mother, widowed, was having problems with her neighbors, and her sons, who were getting the cops called on them all the time for stupid shit, and cops know those type of calls all too well, but she scheduled a meeting with the chief of police, in Hurricane, Utah, Chief Excel, or something like that, and she wanted me to go along with her, to make sure that she had legal representation and protection, and just to hold her hand.  At first the cops were on guard, and they sent their best cop, who knew the laws, ordinances and city code, pretty well.  However, he was about 5'4" to my 5'7 1/2" and I towered over him, and just pushed him aside, when he came and stood Marine stance in front of me . . . and said, I think it is her, you want to talk to.  But, me, my friend, the Chief and this Sergeant, after all the posturing and getting the issues on the tables, actually started just attacking the problem, not the people involved.

The Chief was honest and said, there was a lack of funds to train cops, and any rookie was a liability to any department for about the first three years, and they just hoped that the new cop didn't do much wrong, until they got more familiar with the job.  I understood, seeing I had both worked with the top cop agencies in the state of Utah, and trained cops, often on domestic violence, anger management, ethics and other requested topics, over the years.  When all was said and done, what was most beneficial in the discussion was an understanding of the frustration of the mother, widowed, raising teenage sons, not wanting them hauled into court, every time a neighbor got pissed as something and called the cops, and the cops appreciated me making distinctions between the role of a peace officer, generally being called on non-criminal issues, just with a need to restore the peace, and other situations where the law enforcement role was needed and called for.  It was interesting to me, how freeing that was to the cops.  I was helping my sister with some divorce issues, division of property, and my ex-bro in law called the cops on my sister, and we had the divorce papers, handed them to the cop, and he simply said, this is a civil issue, and left, to our relief, and I am sure to his, knowing my reputation and history with cops.

A Well Ordered Society, Depends On An Agreed Set of Laws . . . The Constitution!  State Constitutions as Touchstones for All Laws!

Along with the Patriot Act, there came this thought that the cops had all powers, and the Constitution, had been obliterated, and it was null and void!  What an asinine thought and it has reaped havoc in the law, on the streets, in both cop and prosecutors offices.  This one act took 240 years of well established laws, and tried to replace them with some law that nobody even knew existed for the most part, nor understood, nor did our representatives, both state and national, get a chance to debate or read, and then with about 1200 executive orders, President Bush, all in the name of national security, allegedly took away all the constitutional rights of the citizens . . . which is pure poppycock and fucking BULL SHIT!  Now it the time to distinguish between a foreign terrorist and a citizen with all the rights, liberties, and protections of the United States Constitutions and the individual state constitutions.  Immunity for cops and others acting under color of law, only comes through well established laws, policies and procedures, not some lame ass law, that negates, ignores, destroys, and obliterates constitutional rights that have been around for centuries!

Thank God, that some of the judges, are taking the bull by the horns, and getting back to the number one or one of the number one reasons for government, to protect the rights of the citizens!  That point has long gone wanting in our legal and judicial systems, and needs a come back.  You may act, as a cop, believing in the Patriot Act, that you are all powerful on the streets, judge, jury and executioner, but you are sadly mistaken, and when you are hit with a civil rights law suit, it will cause great cause for alarm from your city council members, mayors, county commissioners or states, taking a large part of your budget for the year!  You should avoid that at any cost and the cost to you, as cops, dealing with the public, is to respect the constitutional rights of the people, and then you will be safe!  That should be enough law for right now.  But, I do want to let you know, that sending 50 cops cars, police and sheriffs, past where I am sitting, will not change the law, nor the Constitution, nor scare me out of my very educated understanding of the law, nor deter me from going after you!  Thinking big sista, Shelley is me, or Rachel, is not going to win you points when the real attorney, the one trained, with a U.S. Supreme Court Bar membership, that you have to have, to practice or deal with that court, goes after your sorry asses!  Your bitches are NOT ATTORNEYS! And if they are, as in the case of Kay Burningham, she is a shitty attorney, telling you what you want to hear, not WHAT YOU NEED TO HEAR!

GET REAL . . . DEAL WITH IT!  PUSSIES ASIDE!  LOL!


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.